In his
novel, "The Thief and the Dogs," Naguib Mahfouz seamlessly weaves in the literary mode
of stream of consciousness as a ubiquitous element
that amplifies the characterization of the protagonist, Said Mahran.
Through the use of this uniquely modernist narrative technique,
Mahfouz effectually invites the reader to indulge in the illusion that the
reader is privy to Said's innermost thoughts and impulses, therefore
establishing a dynamic rapport between the reader and the protagonist as the
plot progresses. The reader specifically is enabled to comprehend Said's
responses to his external realities as the access to his personal thoughts
and emotional surges act as a medium of important revelation to the
reader. One such moment in the text is evident in Chapter 4 when Said attempts
to break into Rauf Ilwan's ostentatious mansion: “Hasn’t your conscience bothered you even in
the dark?”// “I wish I could penetrate your soul as easily as I’ve penetrated
your house”. It can, hence, be gleaned that Said views his act of breaking into
Ilwan's house as one of deserved vengeance for dissociating with the ideology
he goaded Said to embrace. In a purely linear and descriptive narrative, the
reader would jump to the conclusion that Said is an incorrigible thief who has
returned to his ways as soon as he got out of prison. Yet, with the integration
of the stream of consciousness style, the reader witnesses the internal
conflicts that fuel the external conflicts that ensue.
In the wake of the
context of production— post-revolution Egypt— Naguib utilizes the stream
of consciousness style as a conduit to express his own perplexities vicariously
through Said who epitomizes a tragic hero grappling with the paradigm
shift in Egyptian society under Nasser's regime. Naguib particularly employs
direct and indirect interior monologues and soliloquies as a means of executing
the stream of consciousness narrative, which manifest from the very onset
of the plot. For instance, forming a part of the exposition of the plot in
Chapter 1, immediately following Said's release from prison, an interior
monologue is presented in which Said muses, “Nabawiyya. Ilish. Your two
names merge in my mind...You'll be watching now, but I won't fall into the
trap. At the right moment, instead, I'll strike like Fate.” Through
this quote, the reader is acquainted with the protagonist's sense of animosity
towards the characters of Nabawiyya and Irish without even being introduced to
them. While this instigation of the stream of consciousness technique serves
the purpose of foreshadowing the development of conflict within the plot, it
also creates an atmosphere of suspense and excitement that urges the reader to
further engage in the thrilling nature of the text. Thus, in incorporating the
stream of consciousness narrative, Naguib abandons the normative linear
narrative to adopt the modernist tradition of "breaking away from the old
technique of meticulous details and panoramic narration." In doing so,
Naguib also pioneers the genre of psychological realism, the first of its kind
in Arabic literature, as the complexities of Said's motivations elicit in
the reader a sense of sympathy for the tragic hero and his
fate.
Another facet intrinsic to
the stream of consciousness narrative adopted in Naguib's novel is the subtle
inclusion of non-chronological flashbacks in his writing, which further
enhances the reader's commiseration for the protagonist. In chapter
11, Said recounts his father's encounters with the Sheikh, his mother's death,
and his initial relationship with Rauf Ilwan through the use of flashbacks,
granting the reader a greater understanding of Said's situation.
While the stream of
consciousness narrative style is crucial in Mahfouz's novel, the
former style is coupled with a third person omniscient narrative that
provides a more objective and stable relaying of the events in the novel. A
similar narrative style is employed in China Achebe's, "Things Fall
Apart," a colonial counter-narrative. Like Mahfouz's, "The Thief
and the Dogs," Achebe's, "Things Fall Apart," is penned as
a response to shifting political spheres in the nation. Both these novels
shed light on the complexity of the human experience to psychologically adapt
to societal changes. Subsequently, both these novels then also act as important
socio-political commentaries that highlight the importance of subversive
literature.




